Previous Page
  Next Page
 
Evokation
 
 
Index
 

 

SWORD OF WORDS

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A
=
1
-
5
ADDED
18
18
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
T
=
2
-
2
TO
35
8
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
A
=
1
-
3
ALL
25
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
M
=
4
-
5
MINUS
76
22
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
4
NONE
48
21
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
S
=
1
-
6
SHARED
55
28
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B
=
2
-
2
BY
27
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
E
=
5
-
10
EVERYTHING
133
61
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
M
=
4
-
9
MULTIPLED
121
49
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
I
=
9
-
2
IN
23
14
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
9
ABUNDANCE
65
29
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
-
57
First Total
995
266
59
-
1
2
3
8
5
6
14
8
18
-
-
3+5
-
5+7
Add to Reduce
9+9+5
2+6+6
5+9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
1+8
-
-
8
-
12
Second Total
23
14
15
-
1
2
3
8
5
6
5
8
9
-
-
-
-
1+2
Reduce to Deduce
2+3
1+4
1+5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
3
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
1
2
3
8
5
6
5
8
9

 

 

26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
9
-
-
-
-
5
6
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
6
-
8
+
=
43
4+3
=
7
=
7
=
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
9
-
-
-
-
14
15
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
-
24
-
26
+
=
115
1+1+5
=
7
=
7
=
7
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-
-
1
2
3
4
-
-
7
8
9
-
2
3
4
5
-
7
-
+
=
83
8+3
=
11
1+1
2
=
2
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-
-
10
11
12
13
-
-
16
17
18
-
20
21
22
23
-
25
-
+
=
236
2+3+6
=
11
1+1
2
=
2
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
+
=
351
3+5+1
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
+
=
126
1+2+6
=
9
=
9
=
9
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
1
occurs
x
3
=
3
=
3
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
2
occurs
x
3
=
6
=
6
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
3
occurs
x
3
=
9
=
9
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
+
=
4
occurs
x
3
=
12
1+2
3
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
+
=
5
occurs
x
3
=
15
1+5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
+
=
6
occurs
x
3
=
18
1+8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
+
=
7
occurs
x
3
=
21
2+1
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
+
=
8
occurs
x
3
=
24
2+4
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
9
occurs
x
2
=
18
1+8
9
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
45
-
-
26
-
126
-
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+5
-
-
2+6
-
1+2+6
-
5+4
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
9
-
-
8
-
9
-
9
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
9
-
-
8
-
9
-
9

 

 

 

O
=
6
-
3
OUT
56
11
2
O
=
6
-
2
OF
21
12
3
Z
=
8
-
4
ZERO
64
28
1
C
=
3
-
6
COMETH
64
28
1
O
=
6
-
3
ONE
34
16
7
Q
Q
29
Q
18
Q
239
95
14
-
-
2+9
-
1+8
-
2+3+9
9+5
1+4
-
-
11
-
9
-
14
14
5
-
-
1+1
-
-
-
1+4
1+4
-
-
-
2
-
9
-
5
5
5

 

 

THERE IS NO ATTEMPT MADE TO DESCRIBE THE CREATIVE PROCESS REALISTICALLY

THE ACCOUNT IS SYMBOLIC AND SHOWS GOD CREATING THE WORLD BY MEANS OF LANGUAGE

AS THOUGH WRITING A BOOK BUT LANGUAGE ENTIRELY TRANSFORMED

THE MESSAGE OF CREATION IS CLEAR EACH LETTER OF

THE

ALPHABET

IS

GIVEN

A

NUMERICAL

VALUE BY COMBINING THE LETTERS WITH THE SACRED NUMBERS

REARRANGING THEM IN ENDLESS CONFIGURATIONS

THE MYSTIC WEANED THE MIND AWAY FROM THE NORMAL CONNOTATIONS OF WORDS

 

....

 

THE LIGHT IS RISING RISING IS THE LIGHT

 

 

9
LANGUAGES
87
33
6
3
AND
19
10
1
7
NUMBERS
92
29
2
19
-
198
72
9
1+9
-
1+9+8
7+2
-
10
-
18
9
9
1+0
-
1+8
-
-
1
-
9
9
9

 

 

L
=
3
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
5
T
=
2
-
7
TALKING
74
29
2
N
=
5
-
7
NUMBERS
92
29
2
-
=
10
-
22
-
234
90
9
-
=
1+0
-
2+2
-
2+3+4
9+0
-
-
=
1
-
4
-
9
9
9

 

 

T
=
2
-
9
THE
33
15
6
E
=
5
-
3
ENGLISH
74
29
2
A
=
1
-
7
ALPHABET
65
29
2
-
-
8
-
19
-
172
73
10
-
-
4+6
-
1+9
-
1+7+2
7+3
1+0
-
-
8
-
10
-
10
10
1
-
-
-
-
1+0
-
1+0
1+0
-
-
-
8
-
1
-
1
1
1

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
L
=
3
-
2
L+A+N
27
9
9
A
=
1
-
2
G+U+A+G
18
18
9
N
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
=
3
-
2
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
3
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
G
=
7
-
2
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
U
=
3
-
3
U
21
3
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
3
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
G
=
7
-
4
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
E
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
2
2
6
4
10
6
14
8
9
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
-
-
-
1+0
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
2
2
6
4
1
6
5
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5
-
2
2
6
4
1
6
5
8
9

 

 

DAILY MAIL

Monday, October 8, 2007

Harry Bingham

Page 15

"YOU SAY POTATO, I SAY GHOUGHBTEIGHPTEAU !"

"...Yes you CAN spell potato like that. It's one of the amazing quirks which make English the world's dominant language

 

"ABOUT three years ago I started researching a book, This Little Britain, about the various ways in which we Brits have a history .
of being the exception.
In areas such as law, government, economics, agriculture and science, we've often been a uniquely British exception to a general European rule.
Ditto, in such things as men's fashion, Victorian sewers, drunken yobbishness, and - not least - in the whole area of language and literature.
Take spellings. George Bernard Shaw famously commented that English spelling would allow you to write the word 'fish' as 'ghoti' - and it would sound the same (in the latter, the sound 'f' would be from 'gh', as in 'rough'; 'i' would be from 'o' in 'women' and 'sh' as in 'ti' from 'nation').
But he couldn't have been trying all that hard, if that was the best example he came up with. How about 'potato' as in
'ghoughbteighpteau'? That's the sound 'p' as in hiccough, 'o' as in though, 't' as in debt, 'a' as in neighbour, 't' as in ptomaine, 'o' as in bureau. The fact is that with just 26 letters and 48 different sounds to cope with, there were always going to be problems. :
Throw in other pronunciation changes and an appetite for foreign borrowings, and it's no surprise that English has some of the most dangerously unpredictable spellings in the world.
If our spellings are painful, however, our grammar has its blessedly simple side. French nouns are either masculine or feminine; French verbs vary with every puff of the syntactical breeze.
But French is a pretty simple language. Italian has 50 different forms for every verb, ancient Greek more than 300, modern Turkish an eye popping two million. English, by contrast, has just four verb forms (bark, barks, barking, barked), two noun forms (dog, dogs), and just one adjectival form (snappy), thus making our language about the least inflected in the world.
If that's a curious fact, the reason why is perhaps odder still. Back in Alfred the Great's England, two language communities - English and Danish - inter­mingled. Each community could make out the basic words of the other language.

FOR example, the word 'horse' is 'hors' in Old English, 'hossit' in Old Norse. But all those tricksy little word endings would have made no sense at all. So they began to vanish.
Under pressure of trade, friendship and intermarriage, our ancient ancestors did away with inflections almost completely. Confusing at the time, no doubt, but a blessing for those who need to learn the language today.
And there are plenty of people learning it, of course. With about one-and a-half billion non-native speakers, English has become the world's own language - one that accounts for two-thirds of internet content, and a still larger proportion of the world's scientific and technical journals.
It's sometimes suggested that English has achieved its leadership because it's thelanguage of Shakespeare, . because of its unique and beautiful literature.
That's nonsense, of course. English dominates because the British Isles exported English speakers and gunboats in the 19th century, and because America exported Hollywood, GIs and hamburgers in the 20th.
If those Mayflower settlers had chanced to speak Ubykh (a Caucasian language with 81 consonants and 'three vowels) or Rotokas (a Papua New Guinea language with just six consonants and five vowels), the world would most likely be speaking those fine languages today.
Such dominance has its down­side, of course. There are now about 6,800 languages left in the world, compared with perhaps twice that number back at the dawn of agriculture. The remaining languages are now dying at the rate of about one a fortnight.
English is big in other ways too. If you wanted to learn all the words in the Oxford English Dictionary, you'd have to deal with about 500,000 of them (ending with zyxt, a splendid last word by any standards and an archaic Kentish term for thou seest).
Having done that, you'd probably be a bit taken aback to learn the equivalent American dictionary, Webster's, offers a further 450,000 words or so, of which only about half are to be found in the OED, suggesting a pooled total word count of about 750,000.
But there are lots of words that never get in to either dictionary. Flora and fauna are mostly out. So are most acronyms, slang and dialect. Total that lot up and you'd get to a million or so. Next, you'd need to deal with scientific and technological terms, adding another million or so words.
Otherlanguages-can't keep up. The official dictionary-based word count of German is fewer than 200,000. The French word­count is fewer than 100,000. The scale of our vocabulary is impossible to explain, except by recognising that English users are reckless adopters and inventors.
In the cultural realm, however, mere size is hardly likely to impress. In tenus of Nobel Prizes for literature, the United Kingdom trots home in the bronze medal position (beaten by gold­medallist France, and the silver­gong-holder, the US.).
If, on the other hand, you were looking at the total amount of literatureproduced by the British Isles then we would come in level with France, with 13 prizes.

BUT perhaps that's to measure things the wrong way. If you look at Nobel Prizes by language, then English wins by a country mile 26 laureates vs 13 for France).

More to the point, the Nobel Prize Committee is just that: a committee. Wouldn't it be better to let the world's reading public determine which literature it favours? Alas, there are no reliable global sales figures available.
We do, however, have an index of which authors have written the most translated books. British authors romp home in four of the top five places: Agatha Christie in first, then Enid Blyton, Shakespeare and Barbara Cartland in third to fifth. (The one interloper, Frenchman Jules Verne, is in second place.)
Looking more broadly, British authors dominate the top 40, with some 14 authors on the list, compared with 11 for the United States, and 15 for the entire rest of the world put together.
The obvious conclusion: that we Brits have some natural affinity for words and literature, the way that the Germans 'do' music, or the French 'do' visual art.
Such things run both deep and ancient. The vernacular literature of Alfred the Great's England was the most developed in Europe. It's perhaps not surprising that the same is arguably still true today."

 

"YOU SAY POTATO, I SAY GHOUGHBTEIGHPTEAU !"

 

"How about 'potato' as in
'ghoughbteighpteau'?"

 

-
GHOUGHBTEIGHPTEAU
-
-
-
2
G+H
15
15
6
2
O+U
36
9
9
2
G+H
15
15
6
3
B+T+E
27
9
9
1
I
9
9
9
2
G+H
15
15
6
2
P+T
36
9
9
3
E+A+U
27
9
9
17
GHOUGHBTEIGHPTEAU
180
90
63
1+7
-
1+8+0
9+0
6+3
8
GHOUGHBTEIGHPTEAU
9
9
9

 

 

INDIA I AND I INDIA

 

Amazon.com Apple iBookstore Barnes & Noble

Lord Kapila is a renowned sage and the author of the philosophical system known as Sankhya, which forms an important part of India's ancient philosophical heritage.

Sankhya is a system of metaphysics that deals with the elemental principles of the universe; it is also a system of spiritual knowledge, with its own methodology, and culminates in full consciousness of the Supreme Absolute.

Lord Kapila, however, is not an ordinary philosopher or sage but an incarnation of God.

This book deals with his answers to his mother's enquiry about how to overcome ignorance and delusion and attain spiritual enlightenment.

 

 

LORD KAPILA 99-45-9 9-45-99 KAPILA LORD

KAPILA 50-23-5 5-23-50 KAPILA

DEVAHUTI 90-36-9 9-36-90 DEVAHUTI

 

 

Teachings of Lord Kapila | Krishna.com

krishna.com/books/teachings-of-lord-kapila

Lord Kapila's answers to his mother's inquiry about how to overcome ignorance and attain spiritual enlightenment. Lord Kapila is a renowned sage and the ...

Teachings of Lord Kapila

The Son of Devahuti

Lord Kapila's answers to his mother's inquiry about how to overcome ignorance and attain spiritual enlightenment.

Lord Kapila is a renowned sage and the author of the philosophical system known as Sankhya, which forms an important part of India's ancient philosophical heritage.

Sankhya is a system of metaphysics that deals with the elemental principles of the universe; it is also a system of spiritual knowledge, with its own methodology, and culminates in full consciousness of the Supreme Absolute.

Lord Kapila, however, is not an ordinary philosopher or sage but an incarnation of God.

This book deals with his answers to his mother's enquiry about how to overcome ignorance and delusion and attain spiritual enlightenment.

The underlying theme running throughout his answers and throughout Srila Prabhupada's commentaries on them is that one can achieve this goal by practicing bhakti-yoga, the process of linking one's heart to the Lord's heart through loving devotional service.

This series, with original Sanskrit, translations, and purports, sheds light on such topics as the significance of the guru, the psychology of consciousness, the characteristics of a self-realized person, the science of meditation, the nature of transcendental knowledge, and the process of ultimate liberation.

 

 

THE GUINNESS ENCYCLOPEDIA

John Foley

1993

ALPHABETOLOGY

SIGNS AND SYMBOLS

Page 22

The most commonly used numerical symbols throughout the modern World; the so-called Arabic numerals

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

derive ultimately from a system developed by the Hindus in India sometime between the 3rd Century B,C. and 6th Century A.D.

The more rounded Western Arabic numerals were introduced into Spain by the Moors in the 10th Century.

The first European to take serious note of the new numeration was the French scholar Gerbert of Aurilliac (Pope Sylvester II from 999 to 1003) who had studied the system in Spain

The Hindus are also credited with the invention at some unknown date of the symbol for zero, which was first written as a small circle and later reduced to a large dot.

The nine Indian figures are : 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

With these nine figures and with the sign O any number may be written.

Leonardo of Pisa

Liber abaci

 

 

1234 5 6789

ONE TWO THREE FOUR 5FIVE5 SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE

1234 5 6789 9876 5 4321

NINE EIGHT SEVEN SIX 5FIVE5 FOUR THREE TEO ONE

9876 5 4321

 

 

-
LOVE
-
-
-
2
L+O
27
9
9
2
V+E
27
9
9
4
LOVE
54
18
18
-
-
5+4
1+8
1+8
4
LOVE
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EVOLVE
-
-
-
2
E+V
27
9
9
2
O+L
27
9
9
2
V+E
27
9
9
6
EVOLVE
81
27
27
-
-
8+1
2+7
2+7
6
EVOLVE
9
9
9

 

 

THE LOST LANGUAGE OF SYMBOLISM

Harold Bayley

The Lost Language of Symbolism: An Inquiry into the Origin of Certain Letters,

Words, Names, Fairy-Tales, Folklore, and Mythologies. 2 vol. 1912

Page 41

"Mysticism has universally taught that every man has within himself the germs or seeds of Divinity, and that by self-conquest these sparks of Heaven may be fanned into a flame, the flame into a fire, the fire into a star, and the star into a sun."

 

 

THE LOST LANGUAGE OF SYMBOLISM

Harold Bayley

The Lost Language of Symbolism: An Inquiry into the Origin of Certain Letters,

Words, Names, Fairy-Tales, Folklore, and Mythologies. 2 vol. 1912

INTRODUCTION

"... Although etymologists are agreed that language is fossil poetry and that the creation of every word was originally a poem embodying a bold metaphor or a bright conception, it is quite unrealised how close and intimate a relation exists between symbolism and philology. But, as Renouf points out, " It is not improbable that the cat, in Egyptian Mau, became the symbol of the Sun-God or Day, because the word Mau also means light." 1 Renouf likewise notes that not only was RA the name of the Sun-God, but that it was also the usual Egyptian word for Sun. Similarly the Goose, one of the symbols of SEB, was called a Seb ; the Crocodile, one of the symbols of SEBEK, was called a Sebek; the Ibis, one of the symbols of TECHU, was called a Techu ; and the Jackal, one of the symbols of ANPU (ANUBIS), was called an Anpu.
Parallels to this Egyptian custom are also traceable in Europe, where, among the Greeks, the word Psyche served not only to denote the Soul but also the Butterfly, a symbol of the Soul; and the word Mylitta served both as the name of a Goddess and of her symbol the Bee. Among the ancient Scandinavians the Bull, one of the symbols of THOR, was named a Thor, this being an example, according to Dr Alexander Wilder, " of the punning so common in those times, often making us uncertain whether the accident of similar name or sound led to adoption as a symbol or was merely a blunder." 2
I was unaware that there was any ancient warrant for what I supposed to be the novel supposition that in many / Page12 / instances the names of once-sacred animals contain within themselves the key to what was originally symbolised. The idea that identities of name were primarily due to punning, to blunder, or to accident, must be dispelled when we find that-as in most of the examples noted by myself -the symbolic value of the animal is not expressed by a homonym or pun, but in monosyllables that apparently are the debris of some marvellously ancient, prehistoric, almost extinct parent tongue. Modern language is a mosaic in which lie embedded the chips and fossils of predecessors in comparison with whose vast antiquity Sanscrit is but a speech of yesterday. In its glacier-like progress, Language must have brought down along the ages the detritus of tongues that were spoken possibly millions of years before the art of recording by writing was discovered, but which, notwithstanding, were indelibly inscribed and faithfully preserved in the form of mountain, river, and country names. Empires may disappear and nations be sunk into oblivion under successive waves of invasion, but place names and proper names, preserved traditionally by word of mouth, remain to some extent inviolate; and it is, I am convinced, in this direction that one must look for the hypothetical mother-tongue of the hypothetical people, known nowadays as "Aryans. "

Page 11. Notes.1 On the Origin and Growth of Religion as Illustrated by the Religion 0/
Ancient Egypt, p. 237 ; Hibbcrt Lectures, p. 879. 2 Symbolical Language of Ancient Art and Mythology, R. Payne-Knight,
P.124.

 

-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
L
=
3
-
2
L
12
3
3
A
=
1
-
2
A
1
1
1
N
=
5
-
3
N
14
5
5
G
=
7
-
2
G
7
7
7
U
=
3
-
3
U
21
3
3
A
=
1
-
3
A
1
1
1
G
=
7
-
4
G
7
7
7
E
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
=
3
-
2
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
3
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
G
=
7
-
2
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
U
=
3
-
3
U
21
3
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
3
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
G
=
7
-
4
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
E
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
2
2
6
4
10
6
14
8
9
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
-
-
-
1+0
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
2
2
6
4
1
6
5
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5
-
2
2
6
4
1
6
5
8
9

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
3
5
7
-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
=
3
-
2
L
12
3
3
-
-
3
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
3
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
G
=
7
-
2
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
7
U
=
3
-
3
U
21
3
3
-
-
3
-
-
A
=
1
-
3
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
G
=
7
-
4
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
7
E
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
2
6
10
14
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
-
1+0
1+4
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
2
6
1
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5
-
2
6
1
5

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
L
=
3
-
2
L+A+N
27
9
9
A
=
1
-
2
G+U+A+G
18
18
9
N
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
LANGUAGE
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
3
A
1
1
1
A
=
1
-
2
A
1
1
1
L
=
3
-
2
L
12
3
3
U
=
3
-
3
U
21
3
3
E
=
5
-
3
E
5
5
5
N
=
5
-
3
N
14
5
5
G
=
7
-
2
G
7
7
7
G
=
7
-
4
G
7
7
7
-
-
32
-
8
LANGUAGE
68
32
32
-
-
3+2
-
-
-
6+8
3+2
3+2
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
-
-
5
-
8
LANGUAGE
5
5
5

 

 

SOME MYSTICAL ADVENTURES

G, R, S. Mead 1910

XIII

ON THE ART OF SYMBOLISM.

Page 180

"The Mind of the Father hath sown symbols through the world."

THE CHALDAEAN ORACLES.

" MANY people talk vaguely about symbols and some are really interested in symbolism; but even of those who may happen to possess a little learning on the subject, how few are there who, if they turn and really face themselves and there is no audience to play to, can say they have got to the heart of the matter, or know how rightly to seize the proteus whose changing forms they are ever grasping at, and so force it to speak true words?
I, for my part, freely admit that I am as yet far from the real heart of the matter. I cannot yet hold the proteus steady and force it to speak true words of power; but there is joy in the game of catch-as-can-catch, and I am game for a short bout; though doubtless, as of yore, the wily one will change into something I have never thought of before, and I shall have no grip in mind to hold him.

Page 181

'Symbol' is no native name; it is a Greek importation (symbolon), and its root-meaning is said to be a sign, or token, by which one knows or infers a thing. The utterance of this word should awaken in us the idea of putting together (sym-ballein), with the notion (in the passive) of to correspond and to tally. But to put together is to compare, and so to compare one's own opinion with facts, and hence to conclude, infer, conjecture, interpret; and it is from this last meaning that, the wisdom of the word-books tells us, we get the meaning of symbol as a sign, or token, by which one knows or infers a thing.
I am afraid that we have not yet grasped our proteus amid all these changing forms of words. A symbol is a sign, but that again is a Latin importation (signum), and we may pass it by. A symbol is a token; that is good English. Token is connected with to teach, to point out, show, witness; to betoken is to be a symbol of.
But words will not help us much; they are forms of speech that are ever slipping away into other forms. A symbol is not a word; it is something more fundamental; in its proper meaning it is something almost more primitive than an ideogram, or type-picture. Let us go in search of the idea-the living idea, not some abstract inference-the fulness, not the flat.
If there is a 'flat-land' as compared with a / Page 182 / three-dimensional land, may we not think of symbol-language as a three-dimensional language, so to speak, when compared with the' flat' languages of ordinary speech? Or, to use these words in a deeper meaning, speech in its most primitive mode is action, and so symbolic action, or drama, might be said to be the true symbol­language. This symbol - or three-dimensional language is closely connected with ceremony. And ceremony (Lat. eeremonia) is a word formed on a stem that grows from the root ere (as in creo, I make, create), which is of the same origin as the Sanskrit kri (as in karma, action, doing). A ceremony is a sacred rite; that is, it is typical, and as such should be of creative potency, for as the Chaldaean Oracle has it: "The Mind of the Father hath sown symbols through the world." That which is typical is ideal, for type and idea are synonyms.
Are we now getting any nearer the heart of the matter? Are we beginning to make our symbols alive? Can we afford to dismiss any true symbol with the dull remark: "It's only a symbol"? The universe itself is a symbol; man is a symbol.
Even in their lowest strata symbols are the ' out-lines,' so to say, of three-dimensional objects from some point of view, seen from one side or another; and' out-line' in its inner meaning is / Page 183 / intimately connected with idea; it is, as it were, a ground-plan.
Now as symbols in this sense have to do with ideas and types, are connected with the living side of things, it is not possible to interpret a symbol in one set fashion only and tie it down to one set form. We cannot make an 'exact science' of symbolism; it is initiatory rather than didactic; it 'starts' one towards living ideas, it does not peg us out in some rigid configuration.
So that if it is asked, how does one know that this or that is the right interpretation of any particular symbol, it is exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, to prove it in the way of physical demonstration. If the interpretation really fits, there will be a response within. It will be a living response; not the imprisoning of the mind in a dead form. In the interpretation of symbols we must be prepared to give up exactness, in the way it is generally understood, and allow our minds free play. At the beginning it is best to use any hint that seems to promise well; first apply it in every direction, then as soon as ever it has led to another clue, throw it away.
In learning the great language of symbols it is necessary to keep the mind ever free, plastic, and adaptable. If we persist in keeping stuck in the old ruts, we shall never learn the meaning / Page 184 / of symbols. The beauty of great symbols is the infinite variety of their modes of interpretation. To think there is only one definite interpretation for each symbol is to paralyse one's symbol-mind, and make it fall dead and flat into the superficial. One should play with symbols as a mathematician plays with numbers; symbols are the playthings of the gods. And I think the secret of interpreting symbols is to get the symbol first into one's mind, and not one's mind into the symbol.
The mind should not be allowed to relate itself to the symbol, should not allow itself to be attracted by the picture into going out of itself and crystallising itself into one form; but the symbol should rather be compelled to relate itself to the mind. It should be taken into the mind, and then the mind will be able to see it from every side and grasp it as a whole.
Symbol-language has its letters and its words, and the above may be suggested as a method of learning the alphabet. But symbol-language is not the same thing quite as symbolical language, nor is it to be confused with metaphorical language. Metaphor is transferring the meaning of one word to another in ordinary speech. It is exceedingly important, quite a mystic art, a sort of game of 'general post' among the ideas connected with words.
A metaphor gives a meaning that is not to be / Page 185 / understood literally, or according to the face­value of the letters as we know them, but a reading of root-ideas, as it were, abstracting or subtracting the substance from them. That is to say, we take away the substance that built the idea and keep the idea, and then expand it and spread it out cosmically in every direction. Metaphors may be said to be more connected with substance, symbols with spirit.
Symbols should be ' eaten' and' digested,' so to say. Triangles and svastikas, for instance, might be said to be symbols which, when gazed upon in an ecstatic state of mind-that is, taken within and contemplated-nourish the body of essence; if made alive they create pleasing sensations in it, stimulate, feed, and excite it, rearrange all its activities, alter the currents in it and build it. All great symbols are said to do this-that is, all cosmic symbols or forms that are directly related to things-that-are. These cosmic symbols suggest modes of creative energies; when creative powers act they draw certain patterns and plans and not others; and these patterns, types, and ideas are cosmic symbols, and it is by ecstatically gazing at them, that they nourish our root-substance and so enform it cosmically, or in a harmonious or orderly fashion.
Symbols are toys in the great game. We / Page 186 / should thus learn to play with symbols in the true Kindergarten, the' everlasting revelling­place '-the essential substance that is our nursery and our cradle, and our womb for birth into greater things. But this game is a living thing; we should make symbols act; we learn little while we keep them steady. A true symbol should be ever in motion. Nor should we be satisfied till we can glide from one symbol to another. While we think of symbols as dead detached objects cut off from one another, and bearing no relation to each other, we shall know nothing. We should play with them, draw them or picture them from every stand­point, till we catch fresh glimpses every moment.
Let us think of one great world-body ever in motion; all true symbols may be said to be attempts to snapshot this object in motion. They are like separate films for a cinemato­graph; the great difficulty is to get them in their right sequence and make them pass in procession before the inner eye. If we could manage to do this and obtain the right sequence for a moment, then we should get in touch with some real living ideas. But the right grouping of the symbols is essential. However, the more we practise, the better we guess, the faster will the real ideas come. It is perhaps the greatest of arts-the true practice of the / Page 187 / art of symbolism. We can do it with our minds, with our eyes, with our bodies. Indeed if we could act this continuity between symbols, we should, it is said, breathe in ideas with every movement of the essential body; but this is far more difficult than practising with our minds.
Of course all this applies only to true symbols; many things called symbols are distorted or false appearances. No signs, no symbols, are worth anything unless they signify facts; that is to say, unless they represent transformations which will be experienced when inner vision develops.
A true symbol is something capable of con­taining life. It is never of any arbitrary shape. It must be, or it will never convey living ideas. Symbols, I believe, are not given to make us think in the ordinary sense; their main use is to convey life to our life and bring about a union. Their real use is to convey life of such power that it is capable of actually making an impression, or depression, upon the substance with which the higher mind is connected. They are the link between thought and action. Symbolism is connected with sigils, signatures, characters, types, in their root-meanings, with all the nomenclature connected with the im­pression of ideas on substance.
Before a man is capable of causing his subtle / Pagee 188 / substance to go through all these transformations, * or metamorphoses, at which we have hinted, before these' initiations '-beginnings or startings-can really take place in the root­matter of his vehicles, it is possible for the transformations actually to take place in symbol in his higher mind of ideation. And this is a very desirable thing. To accomplish it in body is doubtless possible for a few only; but to accomplish it in mind is possible for many more. It is not dangerous, and it is a great developer of mental capacity.
It is a method of contemplation. The symbol­learner should strive to get the mind quite still; to get the idea of the mind being as it were a sea of subtle substance. He must not think discursively; must not space out separatE.? symbols and look at them one after the other; but try to 'feel' the mind-substance being moulded.

Page 189

If, for instance, he think of 'potter' and , clay,' he should try to imagine the substance of the mind being moulded from one to the other continuously backwards and forwards, and watch them grow within himself. When practising symbols we should never' objectivise' or project; we should rather' feel' them grow within, and then an occasional idea may flash through.
It is, however, not desirable to pay too much attention to these ideas, for noticing them immediately transfers the consciousness to another' plane' of mind; for though this practice is a mental one it is not in itself a , science.' It is better to notice the ideas that flash forth just sufficiently to record them on the memory-plate, so that they can be used later when the tranquillity of mind that is the essential condition of the practice, has been left.
The world-body, or great surround, or essence­envelope, of every man may be thought of as, so to speak, the L.C. M., or rather G.C.M., of all symbols. It is a useful practice to play with spheres and circles and conic sections, and so try to get ideas along these lines. It is quite credible that it is possible to resolve every symbol into an 'attitude,' so to say, or 'action,' or rather' activity,' of this world-body, and / Page 190 / so connect and link up all symbols by means of this world-soul, which is soul and body also.
This world-body may be said to be our way out of manhood into the cosmos; and so also is the art of symbolism the way out of men's language into the language of the gods. Root­symbols may be regarded as fundamental lines and curves which carry with them certain powers and certain meanings, and these lines and curves are to be found in every science and art of men. They are, from this standpoint, the roots from which all sciences and arts grow, the foundations on which they are built, the gates forth to greater worlds.
It is not, however, to be supposed that such symbolism is the end of the matter; by no means. It is introductory to the linking of Mind on to this world-body. Symbols are, so to say, snapshots of the self-motivity of this world-body; they teach concerning its breathing, concerning the pulsing of its heart.
And even as we can get from art to science or gnosis by means of symbols, so can we get from mind to mind and from Person to Person, - not personality, but the Higher Person or Mind.
But this world-body does not mean a mass of some vast size. This world-body has no definite size; it breathes and is a different size for every mode of breath. It is a node, rather. It is an / Page 191 / ' atom' ordered according to the greater cosmos; and in the greater cosmos the mystics say all things are the same size, or all things are any size, or, again, there is no such thing as size. It does not count in the greater consciousness, any more than we think of the' size' of our breath; though from another point of view, mystically considered, the objective worlds of size are in the breath of the Gods; they breathe and the worlds act, but the Gods do not consider their size.
It might thus be said that every man's world­body is the same size. They are all exactly alike; each is an 'atom,' each is a scale. It is our Great Person or Higher Self that decides what key the scale is in. This means that our Divine Word relates our group of 'letters,' or ' sounds,' or 'planets,' on to something further, and gives them a peculiar meaning of their own. Yet every world-body consists of the same letters, the same groups of sounds, otherwise the Holy Confraternity would be an impossibility.
All this is intimately connected with the mystery of Spirit or Divine Breath; so that when a man's mind is capable of being' fired' with Spirit, it can immediately mould and form
his substance into symbols. It is this power of continually forming man's substance into symbols which brings with it the power of understanding, / Page 192 / for symbols may be said to be the link between substance and Spirit.
It should be noted in this connection, that this language of symbols does not teach us about reincarnation; it is not on that side of things, and this interpretation cannot be forced upon it. Reincarnation is connected with the mind of man, and can be talked about in words; symbols depict the activities of Life in the man's world-body, and are not concerned with death, or form in activity, and the experiences of little persons.
Symbols have rather to do with that which is aeonian, or age-long. A true symbol must be of world-wide experience and age-long ex­perience; it must not be local or temporary.
Thus the only way to control the proteus of symbolism is by becoming him, and so keeping pace with every change, transformation, or metamorphosis; and if one is not as yet strong enough to grip the heart of the matter, at any rate it is something to know the futility of trying to get a true hold by grasping at this or that fleeting appearance.

Page 188. Notes. * The earliest redactor of the Naassene Document writes: "And the Chaldreans say that Soul is very difficult to discover and hard to understand; for it never remains of the same appearance, or form, or in the same state, so that one can describe it by a general type, or comprehend it by an essential quality." On this the Church Father Hippolytus comments, referring to the Naassenes, or Disciples of the Serpent of Wisdom: "These variegated metamorphoses they have laid down in the Gospel super­scribed 'According to the Egyptians.''' (See Thrice­greatest Hermes, i. 150.)

 

NAASSENE 51111555 NAASSENE

 

-
-
-
-
-
NAASSENE
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
S
=
1
-
1
S
19
10
1
S
=
1
-
1
S
19
10
1
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
24
-
8
NAASSENE
78
42
24
-
-
2+4
-
-
-
7+8
4+2
2+4
-
-
6
4
8
NAASSENE
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+5
-
-
-
-
6
4
8
NAASSENE
6
6
6

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
NAASSENES
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
S
=
1
-
1
S
19
10
1
S
=
1
-
1
S
19
10
1
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
S
=
1
-
1
S
19
10
1
-
-
25
-
9
NAASSENES
97
52
25
-
-
2+5
-
-
-
9+7
5+2
2+5
-
-
7
4
9
NAASSENES
16
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+6
-
-
-
-
7
4
9
NAASSENES
7
7
7

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
NAASSENES
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
A
=
1
-
1
A+A+S+S+S
59
32
5
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
25
-
9
NAASSENES
97
52
25
-
-
2+5
-
-
-
9+7
5+2
2+5
-
-
7
4
9
NAASSENES
16
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+6
-
-
-
-
7
4
9
NAASSENES
7
7
7

 

 

LIGHT 56-29-11-2-11-29-56 LIGHT

ISIS 56-20-2-2-56 ISIS

 

M
=
4
-
4
MARY
57
21
3
M
=
4
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
8
-
-
8
-
13
-
119
56
11
-
-
-
-
1+3
-
1+1+9
5+6
1+1
-
-
8
4
4
-
11
11
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+1
1+1
-
-
-
8
4
4
-
2
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MARY
-
-
-
M
=
4
-
1
M
13
4
4
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
R
=
9
-
1
R
18
9
9
Y
=
7
-
1
Y
25
7
7
-
-
21
-
4
MARY
57
21
21
-
-
-
-
-
MAGDALENE
-
-
-
M
=
4
-
1
M
13
4
4
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
G
=
7
-
1
G
7
7
7
D
=
4
-
1
D
4
4
4
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
L
=
3
-
1
L
12
3
3
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
35
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
56
-
13
First Total
119
56
56
-
-
5+6
-
1+3
Add to Reduce
1+1+9
5+6
5+6
-
-
11
4
4
Second Total
11
11
11
-
-
1+1
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+1
1+1
1+1
-
-
2
4
4
Essence of Number
2
2
2

 

 

M
=
4
-
4
MARY
57
21
3
M
=
4
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
8
-
-
8
-
13
-
119
56
11
-
-
-
-
1+3
-
1+1+9
5+6
1+1
-
-
8
4
4
-
11
11
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+1
1+1
-
-
-
8
4
4
-
2
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
M
=
4
-
-
MARY
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
M+A
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
Y
25
7
7
M
=
4
-
4
MARY
57
21
21
M
=
4
-
-
MAGDALENE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
M+A
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
G
7
7
7
-
-
-
-
1
D+A
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
M
=
4
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13
First Total
119
56
56
-
-
-
-
1+3
Add to Reduce
1+1+9
5+6
5+6
-
-
-
-
4
Second Total
11
11
11
-
-
-
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+1
1+1
1+1
-
-
-
-
4
Essence of Number
2
2
2

 

 

M
=
4
-
4
MARY
57
21
3
M
=
4
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
8
-
-
8
-
13
-
119
56
11
-
-
-
-
1+3
-
1+1+9
5+6
1+1
-
-
8
4
4
-
11
11
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+1
1+1
-
-
-
8
4
4
-
2
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MARY
-
-
-
M
=
4
-
1
M
13
4
4
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
R
=
9
-
1
R
18
9
9
Y
=
7
-
1
Y
25
7
7
M
=
4
-
1
M
13
4
4
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
G
=
7
-
1
G
7
7
7
D
=
4
-
1
D
4
4
4
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
L
=
3
-
1
L
12
3
3
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
MAGDALENE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
56
-
13
First Total
119
56
56
-
-
5+6
-
1+3
Add to Reduce
1+1+9
5+6
5+6
-
-
11
4
4
Second Total
11
11
11
-
-
1+1
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+1
1+1
1+1
-
-
2
4
4
Essence of Number
2
2
2

 

 

M
=
4
-
4
MARY
57
21
3
M
=
4
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
8
-
-
8
-
13
-
119
56
11
-
-
-
-
1+3
-
1+1+9
5+6
1+1
-
-
8
4
4
-
11
11
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+1
1+1
-
-
-
8
4
4
-
2
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
MARY
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
M+A
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
Y+G
32
14
5
-
-
-
-
1
M+A
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
D+A
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
13
MAGDALENE
119
56
47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
M
=
4
-
4
MARY
57
21
3
M
=
4
-
9
MAGDALENE
62
35
8
-
-
8
-
13
First Total
119
56
11
-
-
-
-
1+3
Add to Reduce
1+1+9
5+6
1+1
-
-
8
4
4
Second Total
11
11
2
-
-
-
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+1
1+1
-
-
-
8
4
4
Essence of Number
2
2
2

 

 

H
=
8
-
4
HOLY
60
24
6
G
=
7
-
4
GRAIL
47
29
2
-
-
16
-
8
Add to Reduce
107
53
8
-
-
1+6
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+0+7
5+3
-
-
-
7
4
8
Essence of Number
8
8
8

 

 

H
=
8
-
-
HOLY
-
-
-
G
=
7
-
-
GRAIL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
H
=
8
-
4
HOLY
60
24
6
G
=
7
-
4
GIRL
46
28
1
-
-
16
-
9
Add to Reduce
107
53
8
-
-
1+6
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+0+7
5+3
-
-
-
7
4
9
Essence of Number
8
8
8

 

 

H
=
8
-
4
HOLY
60
24
6
G
=
7
-
4
GRAIL
47
29
2
I
=
9
-
2
IS
28
19
1
-
-
24
-
10
Add to Reduce
135
53
9
-
-
2+4
-
1+0
Reduce to Deduce
1+3+5
5+3
-
-
-
6
4
1
Essence of Number
9
9
9

 

 

H
=
8
-
4
HOLY
60
24
6
G
=
7
-
4
GRAIL
47
29
2
I
=
9
-
2
IS
28
19
1
-
-
24
-
10
Add to Reduce
135
53
9
-
-
2+4
-
1+0
Reduce to Deduce
1+3+5
5+3
-
-
-
6
4
1
Essence of Number
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
H
=
8
-
4
HOLY
60
24
6
G
=
7
-
4
GIRL
46
28
1
I
=
9
-
2
IS
28
19
1
-
-
25
-
11
Add to Reduce
135
72
9
-
-
2+5
-
1+1
Reduce to Deduce
1+3+5
7+2
-
-
-
7
4
2
Essence of Number
9
9
9

 

 

H
=
8
-
-
HEAVEN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
H+A
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
4
E+V+E+N
46
19
1
H
=
8
-
6
HEAVEN
55
28
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+5
2+8
1+0
H
=
8
4
6
HEAVEN
10
10
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+0
1+0
-
H
=
8
4
6
HEAVEN
1
1
7

 

 

E
=
5
-
5
EVENS
65
20
2
S
=
1
-
5
SEVEN
65
20
2

 

 

M
=
4
-
-
MANNA
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
M+A
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
A
1
1
1
M
=
4
-
5
MANNA
43
16
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+3
1+6
1+6
M
=
4
4
5
MANNA
7
7
7

 

 

E
=
5
-
-
EARTH
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
H
8
8
8
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
T
20
2
2
E
=
5
-
5
EARTH
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
2+5
E
=
5
4
5
EARTH
7
7
7

 

 

H
=
8
-
-
HEART
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
T
20
2
2
-
-
-
-
1
H
8
8
8
H
=
8
-
5
HEART
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
2+5
H
=
8
4
5
HEART
7
7
7

 

 

H
=
8
-
-
HEART
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
H
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
T
2
2
2
-
-
-
-
1
H
8
8
8
H
=
8
-
5
HEART
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
2+5
H
=
8
4
5
HEART
7
7
7

 

 

E
=
5
-
5
EARTH
52
25
25
H
=
8
-
5
HEART
52
25
25
H
=
8
-
5
THERA
52
25
25
H
=
8
-
5
TERA
52
25
25

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LIVED
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
D
4
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
L
=
3
-
5
LIVED
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
2+5
L
=
3
4
5
LIVED
7
7
7

 

 

D
=
3
-
-
DEVIL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
D
4
4
4
D
=
3
-
5
DEVIL
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
2+5
D
=
3
4
5
DEVIL
7
7
7

 

 

E
=
3
-
-
EVIL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
E
=
3
-
4
EVIL
48
21
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+8
2+1
2+1
E
=
3
4
4
EVIL
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+2
-
-
E
=
3
4
4
EVIL
3
3
3

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LIVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
L
=
3
-
4
LIVE
48
21
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+8
2+1
2+1
L
=
3
4
4
LIVE
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+2
-
-
L
=
3
4
4
LIVE
3
3
3

 

 

L
=
3
4
4
LIVE
48
21
21
E
=
3
4
4
EVIL
48
3
3
V
=
3
-
4
VEIL
48
21
21
V
=
3
-
4
VILE
48
21
21
L
=
3
-
4
LEVI
48
21
21

 

 

I
=
9
-
4
INNER
60
33
6
S
=
1
-
9
SINNER
79
20
2
N
=
5
-
9
NEEDS
47
20
2
F
=
6
-
4
FEEDS
39
21
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
INNER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
INNER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SINNER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
S
19
10
1
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
13
SINNER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NEEDS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
D+S
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
NEEDS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
FEEDS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
F
6
6
6
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
D+S
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
FEEDS
-
-
-

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
SEEDS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
S
19
10
1
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
D+S
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
5
SEEDS
52
25
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
1+6
-
-
-
-
5
SEEDS
7
7
7

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LEVEL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
L
=
3
-
5
LEVEL
56
20
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+6
2+0
2+0
L
=
3
4
5
LEVEL
11
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+1
-
-
L
=
3
4
5
LEVEL
2
2
2

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LEVEL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
L+E
17
8
8
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
2
E+L
17
8
8
L
=
3
-
5
LEVEL
56
20
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+6
2+0
2+0
L
=
3
4
5
LEVEL
11
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+1
-
-
L
=
3
4
5
LEVEL
2
2
2

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
EVEN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
L
=
3
-
4
EVEN
46
19
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+6
1+9
1+9
L
=
3
4
4
EVEN
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+0
1+0
1+0
L
=
3
4
4
EVEN
1
1
1

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
EVEN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
2
V+E
27
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
L
=
3
-
4
EVEN
46
19
19
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+6
1+9
1+9
L
=
3
4
4
EVEN
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+0
1+0
1+0
L
=
3
4
4
EVEN
1
1
1

 

 

E
=
5
-
-
EVER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
2
E+R
23
14
5
E
=
5
-
4
EVEN
50
23
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
2+3
1+4
E
=
5
4
4
EVEN
5
5
5

 

 

E
=
5
-
-
EVER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
E
=
5
-
4
EVER
50
23
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
2+3
1+4
E
=
5
4
4
EVER
5
5
5

 

 

A
=
1
-
1
ADAM
19
10
1
A
=
1
-
1
AND
19
10
1
E
=
5
-
30
EVE
32
14
5
-
-
7
-
3
Add to Reduce
70
34
7
-
-
3+5
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
7+0
3+4
-
-
-
7
-
3
Essence of Number
7
7
7

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
ADAM AND EVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
D
=
4
-
1
D
4
4
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
M
=
4
-
1
M
13
4
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
D
=
4
-
1
D
4
4
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
V
=
4
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
34
-
10
ADAM AND EVE
70
34
34
-
3
3
1
16
15
6
7
8
8
-
-
3+4
-
1+0
-
7+0
3+4
3+4
-
-
-
-
1+6
1+5
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
1
-ADAM AND EVE
7
7
7
-
3
3
3
7
6
6
7
8
8

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
ADAM AND EVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
A+D
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
A+M
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
A+D
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
V
=
4
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
22
-
10
ADAM AND EVE
70
34
34
-
3
3
1
5
30
6
7
8
9
-
-
2+2
-
1+0
-
7+0
3+4
3+4
-
-
-
-
-
3+0
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
1
-ADAM AND EVE
7
7
7
-
3
3
3
5
3
6
7
8
9

 

 

H
=
8
-
-
HEAVEN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
H+A
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
4
E+V+E+N
46
19
1
H
=
8
-
6
HEAVEN
55
28
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+5
2+8
1+0
H
=
8
4
6
HEAVEN
10
10
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+0
1+0
-
H
=
8
4
6
HEAVEN
1
1
7

 

....

 

ON THE NATURE OF THINGS

de rerum natura

LUCRETIUS

Back Page

“Almost nothing is known about the author of this great poem,

except that he was a Roman of aristocratic birth, and that he lived from about
99-55 BC.”

 

LUCRETIUS

ON THE NATURE OF THINGS

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
2
ON
29
11
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
3
THE
33
15
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
6
NATURE
79
25
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
O
=
6
-
2
OF
21
12
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
6
THINGS
77
32
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
21
-
19
First Total
239
221
23
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
3+1
-
1+9
Add to Reduce
2+3+9
2+2+1
2+3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
10
Second Total
14
5
5
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
1+0
Reduce to Deduce
1+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
1
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

 

 

On Nature (Peri Physeos)
by Parmenides of Elea (c. 475 B.C.)
On Nature (Peri Physeos) by Parmenides of Elea


On Nature by Parmenides of Elea. A highly readable translation of the classic by the Greek father of metaphysics. Edited by Allan F. Randall from translations by ...
Theurgy and Numbers: On Nature - Peri Physeos

On Nature (Peri Physeos) by Parmenides of Elea (c. 475 B.C.)

ON NATURE 108-36-9

 

O
=
6
-
2
ON
29
11
2
N
=
5
-
6
NATURE
79
25
7
-
-
21
-
8
Add to Reduce
108
36
9
-
-
3+1
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+0+8
3+6
-
-
-
3
-
8
Essence of Number
9
9
9

 

 

B
=
2
4
BLUE
40
13
4
P
=
7
6
PLANET
68
23
5
``-
-
9
10
-
108
36
9
-
-
-
1+0
-
1+0+8
3+6
-
-
-
9
1
-
9
9
9

 

Blue Planet : Complete BBC Series Special Edition 4 Disc ...

www.amazon.co.uk › DVD & Blu-ray › Television › Documentary

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
AH
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
I
=
9
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
S
=
1
-
3
SEE
29
11
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
=
9
-
2
IT
29
11
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
3
ALL
25
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
N
=
5
-
3
NOW
52
16
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
S
=
1
-
4
SAID
33
15
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
3
THE
33
15
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
B
=
2
-
8
BLIND-MAN
69
33
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
35
-
30
First Total
288
126
54
-
1
4
3
4
5
18
14
8
18
-
-
3+5
-
3+0
Add to Reduce
2+8+8
1+2+6
5+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+8
1+4
-
1+8
-
-
8
-
3
Second Total
18
9
9
-
1
4
3
4
5
9
5
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
3
Essence of Number
9
9
9
-
1
4
3
4
5
9
5
8
9

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
6
7
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
2
AH
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
9
I
=
9
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
9
S
=
1
-
3
SEE
29
11
2
-
2
-
-
-
I
=
9
-
2
IT
29
11
2
-
2
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
3
ALL
25
7
7
-
-
-
7
-
N
=
5
-
3
NOW
52
16
7
-
-
-
7
-
S
=
1
-
4
SAID
33
15
6
-
-
6
-
-
T
=
2
-
3
THE
33
15
6
-
-
6
-
-
B
=
2
-
8
BLIND-MAN
69
33
6
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
35
-
30
First Total
288
126
54
-
4
18
14
18
-
-
3+5
-
3+0
Add to Reduce
2+8+8
1+2+6
5+4
-
-
1+8
1+4
1+8
-
-
8
-
3
Second Total
18
9
9
-
4
9
5
9
-
-
-
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
3
Essence of Number
9
9
9
-
4
9
5
9

 

 

PLANET E PLANT E PLANET

 

 

P
=
7
-
PLANET
-
-
-
``-
-
-
5
PLANT
63
18
9
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
P
-
7
6
PLANET
68
23
14
-
-
-
-
-
6+8
2+3
1+4
P
-
7
6
PLANET
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
-
P
-
7
6
PLANET
5
5
5

 

 

B
=
2
4
BLUE
40
13
4
P
=
7
6
PLANET
68
23
5
``-
-
9
10
-
108
36
9
-
-
-
1+0
-
1+0+8
3+6
-
-
-
9
1
-
9
9
9

 

 

W
=
5
-
WORLD
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
``-
-
-
4
WORD
60
24
6
W
=
5
5
WORLD
72
27
9
-
-
-
-
-
7+2
2+7
-
W
=
5
5
WORLD
9
9
9

 

 

V
=
4
5
VENUS
81
18
9
H
=
8
5
HORUS
81
27
9
S
=
1
3
SUN
54
9
9

 

 

L
=
3
4
LOVE
54
18
9
L
=
3
6
EVOLVE
81
27
9
L
=
3
4
LORD
49
22
4
O
=
6
5
ORDER
60
33
6
L
=
3
5
WORLD
72
27
9

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LIVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
L
=
3
-
4
LIVE
48
21
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+8
2+1
2+1
L
=
3
4
4
LIVE
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+2
-
-
L
=
3
4
4
LIVE
3
3
3

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LOVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
L
=
3
-
4
LOVE
54
18
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+4
1+8
1+8
L
=
3
4
4
LOVE
9
9
9

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LIVE LOVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
I
9
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
L
=
3
-
4
LIVE
48
21
21
L
=
3
-
-
LOVE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
1
V
22
4
4
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
L
=
3
-
-
LOVE
54
18
18
L
=
3
-
4
LIVE LOVE
102
39
39
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+8
2+1
3+9
L
=
3
4
4
LIVE LOVE
12
12
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+2
1+2
1+2
L
=
3
4
4
LIVE LOVE
3
3
3

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LEARN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
L
=
3
-
5
LEARN
50
23
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
2+3
2+1
L
=
3
4
5
LEARN
5
5
5

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
LEARN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
A
1
1
1
-
-
-
-
1
L
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
L
=
3
-
5
LEARN
50
23
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
2+3
2+1
L
=
3
4
5
LEARN
5
5
5

 

 

L
=
3
-
4
LIGHT
56
29
2
L
=
3
-
4
LIVE
48
21
3
L
=
3
-
5
LEARN
50
23
5
L
=
3
-
4
LOVE
54
18
9
-
-
10
-
10
First Total
208
91
19
-
-
1+0
-
1+0
Add to Reduce
2+0+8
9+1
1+9
4
4
1
4
1
Second Total
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+0
1+0
1+0
4
4
4
4
4
Essence of Number
1
1
1

 

SOUL SO U LIVE U SO SOUL

SOUL SO U LEARN U SO SOUL

SOUL SO U LOVE U SO SOUL

 

......

 

G
=
7
-
3
GOD
26
17
8
G
=
7
-
2
GO
22
13
4
D
=
4
-
2
DO
19
10
1
G
=
7
-
6
GOOD
41
23
5
-
-
63
-
63
Add to Reduce
108
63
18
-
-
6+3
-
6+3
Reduce to Deduce
1+0+8
6+3
1+8
-
-
9
-
9
Essence of Number
9
9
9

 

 

4
SIGN
49
22
4
3
AND
19
10
1
6
SYMBOL
86
23
5
13
First Total
154
55
10
1+3
Add to Reduce
1+5+4
5+5
1+0
4
Second Total
10
10
1
-
Reduce to Deduce
1+0
1+0
-
4
Essence of Number
1
1
1

 

 

S
=
1
4
SIGN
49
22
4
S
=
1
6
SYMBOL
86
23
5
``-
-
2
10
-
135
45
9
-
-
-
1+0
-
1+3+5
4+5
-
-
-
2
1
-
9
9
9

 

 

Ahmose I - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmose_I

Ahmose I (Egyptian: Jˁḥ ms(j.w), sometimes written Amosis I, "Amenes" and "Aahmes" ... Ahmose I assumed the throne after the death of his brother, and upon ...
‎Family - ‎Dates and length of reign - ‎Campaigns - ‎Art and monumental constructions
Ahmose I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Nebpehtire" redirects here. For the Sixth dynasty pharaoh, see Merenre Nemtyemsaf II.

Ahmose I
Pharaoh

Ahmose I was a pharaoh of ancient Egypt and the founder of the Eighteenth dynasty. He was a member of the Theban royal house, the son of pharaoh Seqenenre Tao and brother of the last pharaoh of the Seventeenth dynasty, King Kamose. Wikipedia

Born: Thebes, Egypt

Died: 1526 BC, Abydos, Egypt

Children: Amenhotep I, Ahmose-Meritamun, Mutnofret, Ahmose-Sitamun, Ramose, Ahmose-ankh, Siamun

Siblings: Ahmose-Nefertari, Kamose

Parents: Seqenenre Tao, Ahhotep I

Ahmose I

Amosis, according to Manetho,[1] also Amasis[2]
A fragmentary statue of Ahmose I, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
A fragmentary statue of Ahmose I, Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Pharaoh

Reign
c. 1539–1514 BCE (Conventional Egyptian chronology) (disputed)
25 years in Manetho (18th Dynasty)

Predecessor
Kamose (Upper Egypt), Khamudi (Lower Egypt)

Successor
Amenhotep I

Royal titulary[show]

Consort
Ahmose-Nefertari, God's Wife of Amun, Ahmose-Sitkamose, Ahmose-Henuttamehu

Children
Princess Ahmose-Meritamon
Princess Ahmose-Sitamun
Prince Siamun
Prince Ahmose-ankh
Amenhotep I
Prince Ramose
possibly Mutnofret

Father
Seqenenre Tao

Mother
Ahhotep I

Died
c. 1525 BC

Burial
Mummy found in Deir el-Bahri cache, but was likely originally buried in Abydos

Monuments
Palace at Avaris, Temple of Amun at Karnak, Temple of Montu at Armant
See Amasis II for the 26th Dynasty pharaoh whose name sometimes appears as Ahmose II.
Ahmose I (Egyptian: Jˁḥ ms(j.w), sometimes written Amosis I, "Amenes" and "Aahmes" and meaning Born of Iah [5]) was a pharaoh of ancient Egypt and the founder of the Eighteenth dynasty. He was a member of the Theban royal house, the son of pharaoh Seqenenre Tao and brother of the last pharaoh of the Seventeenth dynasty, King Kamose. During the reign of his father or grandfather, Thebes rebelled against the Hyksos, the rulers of Lower Egypt. When he was seven his father was killed,[6] and he was about ten when his brother died of unknown causes, after reigning only three years. Ahmose I assumed the throne after the death of his brother,[7] and upon coronation became known as Neb-Pehty-Re (The Lord of Strength is Re). The name Ahmose is a combination of the divine name 'Ah' (see Iah) and the combining form '-mose'.

During his reign, he completed the conquest and expulsion of the Hyksos from the delta region, restored Theban rule over the whole of Egypt and successfully reasserted Egyptian power in its formerly subject territories of Nubia and Canaan.[7] He then reorganized the administration of the country, reopened quarries, mines and trade routes and began massive construction projects of a type that had not been undertaken since the time of the Middle Kingdom. This building program culminated in the construction of the last pyramid built by native Egyptian rulers. Ahmose's reign laid the foundations for the New Kingdom, under which Egyptian power reached its peak. His reign is usually dated to the mid-16th century BC.

 

 

A
=
1
-
-
AHMOSE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
A+H
12
3
3
-
-
-
-
4
MOSE
22
4
4
A
=
1
-
6
AHMOSE
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
-
-
5+2
2+5
2+5
A
=
1
4
6
AHMOSE
7
7
7

 

 

L
=
3
-
-
AHMOSE
52
25
25
-
-
-
-
1
NEFERTITI
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
F
6
6
6
-
-
-
-
1
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
1
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
1
T
20